🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.