🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader claiming the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if discussions restart.

The American leader last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to enforce their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the face of this assault."