🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.